[OCF] ocf-shellfuncs standardization - Comments? Objections?

[Alan Robertson]

Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 20:50 -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
> 
>>It defines some variables which we had mostly agreed upon, and a 
>>function, which I can't find any reference for us every finalizing on in 
>>the spec, or on the mailing list.
>>
>>The function is ocf_log - which (as written) takes at least two arguments:
>>
>>   1:   severity
>>   2-n: message text
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>It clearly needs to be part of the RA spec - since you shouldn't
>>write an RA without it...
> 
> For what it's worth, +1
> 
> It makes a great deal of sense to enforce a standard convention on the
> name/call semantics for a logging function.

OK.  I agree.  But, what exactly do you mean...

Do you mean you agree, but it should be more stringent, or that you 
agree, and that's that, or that you disagree :-).


-- 
     Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh>

"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship...  Let me 
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William 
Wilberforce