[OCF] ocf-shellfuncs standardization - Comments? Objections?

[Lon Hohberger]

On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 20:50 -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:

> It defines some variables which we had mostly agreed upon, and a 
> function, which I can't find any reference for us every finalizing on in 
> the spec, or on the mailing list.
> 
> The function is ocf_log - which (as written) takes at least two arguments:
> 
>    1:   severity
>    2-n: message text

<snip>

> It clearly needs to be part of the RA spec - since you shouldn't
> write an RA without it...

For what it's worth, +1

It makes a great deal of sense to enforce a standard convention on the
name/call semantics for a logging function.

-- Lon