[OCF]OCF Agenda for OLS

[Horms]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 04:38:19PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2003-07-21T15:51:35,
>    Alan Robertson <alanr@unix.sh> said:
> 
> > Here is the proposed agenda for Sunday, please send suggestions for changes:
> 
> I'd be up for moving the meeting to an earlier time so we are done at
> 12. Or, if everybody wants to, continue it during or after the Hacker
> Bike Ride, as I'd really love to go there to stretch from the week-long
> conference ;-)
> http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2003/view_abstract.php?talk=197
> 
> > 	- Future plans:
> > 		The areas we've had the most success in are those areas
> > 		where we very nearly have an implementation ready to go.
> > 		Is this a practical prerequisite for the standards?
> 
> It should be.
> 
> > Anything else?
> 
> I'm still wondering what to do about lack of interest. Right now, we are
> _still_ trying to standarize hot air. I think we made a bad approach
> here, and the "Future plans" summarizes the problem.
> 
> I'd say that we first need to have code (of course with the intent to
> make it a standard), and then try to get people to agree with us on it.
> 
> I'll put it even more strongly: Personally, I'm fed up with spending
> time discussing standards which very few people outside the Linux HA
> project have shown very limitted interest in. Time which would be better
> used to actually implement them.
> 
> I think we should try to learn from IEEE - show two implementations
> before we consider talking to you about a standard.
> 
> We should adopt that too.

I am also a little retisent to devote time for the same reasons.



-- 
Horms