[OCF]Updates Resource Agent API

Horms ocf@lists.community.tummy.com
Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:51:38 +0900


On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:08:06AM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2003-08-01T11:11:57,
>    Horms <horms@verge.net.au> said:
> 
> > * Section 3.2
> > 
> >   "The subdirectories allow the installation of multiple RAs for the same
> >   type, but from different vendors or package versions.
> > 
> >   TODO: As the resource type is also embedded in the metadata returned
> >   from the RA, should this sentence go away and instead have the RM
> >   discover the installed resource types?"
> > 
> >   I don't see any advantage to this. The proposed directory
> >   structure seems both logical and conenient.
> 
> Well, but it also means that the filenames have special meanings which
> is redundant wrt the metadata. I was just asking whether that was a good
> idea.

Good point. Redundant infomration usually isn't desirable.
But perhaps it is a mechanism to ensure that the directories
are uniqe.


> What do the others think?
>
> 
> > * Section 5.2
> > 
> >   I don't understand "vs"
> > 
> >   "An example of a vs fully supported by the system."
> > 
> > * Sections 5 and 5.1 appear to be duplicated
> 
> That all looks like a vi accident ;-) I'll check CVS and fix it.
> 
> > * Contributors
> > 
> >   Simon Horms -> Simon Horman
> 
> Oops. Thats what you get for using nicknames. I'm really sorry, I always
> got that wrong ;-) Fixed, of course.

Just don't tell anyone you know my real name or I will
have to remove your tounge.

-- 
Horms