[OCF]Updates Resource Agent API
Horms
ocf@lists.community.tummy.com
Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:51:38 +0900
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:08:06AM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2003-08-01T11:11:57,
> Horms <horms@verge.net.au> said:
>
> > * Section 3.2
> >
> > "The subdirectories allow the installation of multiple RAs for the same
> > type, but from different vendors or package versions.
> >
> > TODO: As the resource type is also embedded in the metadata returned
> > from the RA, should this sentence go away and instead have the RM
> > discover the installed resource types?"
> >
> > I don't see any advantage to this. The proposed directory
> > structure seems both logical and conenient.
>
> Well, but it also means that the filenames have special meanings which
> is redundant wrt the metadata. I was just asking whether that was a good
> idea.
Good point. Redundant infomration usually isn't desirable.
But perhaps it is a mechanism to ensure that the directories
are uniqe.
> What do the others think?
>
>
> > * Section 5.2
> >
> > I don't understand "vs"
> >
> > "An example of a vs fully supported by the system."
> >
> > * Sections 5 and 5.1 appear to be duplicated
>
> That all looks like a vi accident ;-) I'll check CVS and fix it.
>
> > * Contributors
> >
> > Simon Horms -> Simon Horman
>
> Oops. Thats what you get for using nicknames. I'm really sorry, I always
> got that wrong ;-) Fixed, of course.
Just don't tell anyone you know my real name or I will
have to remove your tounge.
--
Horms