[OCF]Updates Resource Agent API
Lars Marowsky-Bree
ocf@lists.community.tummy.com
Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:08:06 +0200
--5LiOUhUlsRX0HDkW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2003-08-01T11:11:57,
Horms <horms@verge.net.au> said:
> * Section 3.2
>=20
> "The subdirectories allow the installation of multiple RAs for the same
> type, but from different vendors or package versions.
>=20
> TODO: As the resource type is also embedded in the metadata returned
> from the RA, should this sentence go away and instead have the RM
> discover the installed resource types?"
>=20
> I don't see any advantage to this. The proposed directory
> structure seems both logical and conenient.
Well, but it also means that the filenames have special meanings which
is redundant wrt the metadata. I was just asking whether that was a good
idea.
What do the others think?
> * Section 5.2
>=20
> I don't understand "vs"
>=20
> "An example of a vs fully supported by the system."
>=20
> * Sections 5 and 5.1 appear to be duplicated
That all looks like a vi accident ;-) I'll check CVS and fix it.
> * Contributors
>=20
> Simon Horms -> Simon Horman
Oops. Thats what you get for using nicknames. I'm really sorry, I always
got that wrong ;-) Fixed, of course.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e <lmb@suse.de>
--=20
SuSE Labs - Research & Development, SuSE Linux AG
=20
"If anything can go wrong, it will." "Chance favors the prepared (mind)."
-- Capt. Edward A. Murphy -- Louis Pasteur
--5LiOUhUlsRX0HDkW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Ki2mudf3XQV4S2cRAohIAJ4lVt55SwBB6DgUjA29gqFQ7RK1+ACfdc+H
LgL1FnfqMob/ShXzIb+uISg=
=kHK3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--5LiOUhUlsRX0HDkW--