[OCF]Updates Resource Agent API

Lars Marowsky-Bree ocf@lists.community.tummy.com
Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:08:06 +0200


--5LiOUhUlsRX0HDkW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2003-08-01T11:11:57,
   Horms <horms@verge.net.au> said:

> * Section 3.2
>=20
>   "The subdirectories allow the installation of multiple RAs for the same
>   type, but from different vendors or package versions.
>=20
>   TODO: As the resource type is also embedded in the metadata returned
>   from the RA, should this sentence go away and instead have the RM
>   discover the installed resource types?"
>=20
>   I don't see any advantage to this. The proposed directory
>   structure seems both logical and conenient.

Well, but it also means that the filenames have special meanings which
is redundant wrt the metadata. I was just asking whether that was a good
idea.

What do the others think?

> * Section 5.2
>=20
>   I don't understand "vs"
>=20
>   "An example of a vs fully supported by the system."
>=20
> * Sections 5 and 5.1 appear to be duplicated

That all looks like a vi accident ;-) I'll check CVS and fix it.

> * Contributors
>=20
>   Simon Horms -> Simon Horman

Oops. Thats what you get for using nicknames. I'm really sorry, I always
got that wrong ;-) Fixed, of course.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e <lmb@suse.de>

--=20
SuSE Labs - Research & Development, SuSE Linux AG
 =20
"If anything can go wrong, it will." "Chance favors the prepared (mind)."
  -- Capt. Edward A. Murphy            -- Louis Pasteur

--5LiOUhUlsRX0HDkW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Ki2mudf3XQV4S2cRAohIAJ4lVt55SwBB6DgUjA29gqFQ7RK1+ACfdc+H
LgL1FnfqMob/ShXzIb+uISg=
=kHK3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5LiOUhUlsRX0HDkW--