[LinuxFailSafe] FailSafe, comments, bug tracking?

[Mayank Vasa]

Joshua Rodman wrote:
> 
> Hi all:
> 
> I'm starting to go through the cluster_services commands and taking notes
> to understand them better as I go.  I'll be reading through the arch docs
> I promised to look at a while ago as I now have the need (shame on me).
> 
> I'm sharing my notes with David here at SuSE, and they'll become one big
> textfile I can dash off to anyone interested.  They're mainly a bunch of
> nitpicks at the moment, but they may grow over time into some more real
> docs on the system.
> 
> Question #1 - Is this redundant?
> 
> Selfish question, yes.. I could look, but I am looking at lots of things
> failsafe, so I thought I'd ask if anyone knew.
> 
> Next, among other things, I'm identifying bugs (trivial so far.. but hey).
> Eventually I'll create patches, but I was wondering what the plan was for
> defect tracking.
> 
> Question #2 - How will/does defect tracking work?
> 
> It would be trivial to use sourceforge's if nothing else.  I clicked
> around on oss.sgi.com a bit and didn't see any bugzillas, gnats, or any
> such equivalent.  How is this working for your projects?
> 
> Maybe this is premature, I'd just hate to see defects get lost in the
> noise.
> 

Josh,

In my presentation at the FailSafe symposium I had briefly talked about
bug tracking via bugzilla. It has been implemented for FailSafe at
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla. I will add the link to the main FailSafe
page (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/failsafe/)

Could you re-phrase question # 1 for me, maybe expand a bit on what you
mean by 'redundant' (as in redundant failsafe services?)

Thanks.
-- 
Mayank Vasa
Linux FailSafe Team.
SGI-One step ahead