[Linux-HA] Virtual Name and Samba clarification.
dejanmm at fastmail.fm
Thu Mar 18 09:24:47 MDT 2010
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:52:45AM -0600, Tim Serong wrote:
> On 3/18/2010 at 09:41 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Tim Serong <tserong at novell.com> wrote:
> > > Also, someone really needs to publish some
> > > documentation on effective use of Samba with Linux-HA/Pacemaker clusters
> > > (having written this email, I have a sinking feeling I will be volunteered
> > > for the task).
> > What an excellent idea :-)
> Rats. Oh well, no time like the present I guess:
> It's incredibly terse (i.e. doesn't really say much more than I said in my
> last email), but I figure published *something* is better than published
> *nothing*, assuming a reasonable degree of accuracy :)
It's short and concise. Great! I like brevity!
> > And one more thing, you can also run samba on top of ocfs2 or gfs2
> > (provided you start using pacemaker on top of corosync instead of
> > heartbeat).
> > Someone was playing around with it the other day and verified that the
> > samba ping-pong test worked fine.
> Good point.
> Tim Serong <tserong at novell.com>
> Senior Clustering Engineer, OPS Engineering, Novell Inc.
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
More information about the Linux-HA