[Linux-HA] CRM or not CRM for Active/Passive Imap Server ?
fabrice.grelaud at u-bordeaux1.fr
Mon Jul 30 09:38:03 MDT 2007
Quoting Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com>:
> On 7/19/07, FG <fabrice.grelaud at u-bordeaux1.fr> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I have two servers with each one two HBA cards (FC) attached to a SAN
>> IBM DS4000 where we store the mailbox.
>> These 2 servers are in Active/Passive configuration with heartbeat and
>> use stonith to ensure no data corruption.
>> I just want to know which interest i have to use crm configuration
>> rather than haresources file for my configuration, only two nodes ?
> haresources is generally simpler to get started with
> however it is less flexible and isn't receiving much attention from
> developers these days
> there are also conversion scripts to convert a haresources
> configuration to a crm one... so you can start with one and migrate to
> the other
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
finally, i choose crm because like you say, more flexible and more
powerful to handle score and to understand the functionalities.
We are in test phase with RHEL5 and heartbeat 2.1.1 (install from
tar.gz) in spite of the Alan's announce.
All failure's test are ok except stonith, we don't have to test yet.
W'll see after holidays (end of august). And maybe, a new release will
I would like to congratulate all the team for your admirable work.
More information about the Linux-HA