[Linux-HA] groups and colocation (lsb script and ip)

[Jeff Humes]

I figure out this issue just after I compile this email.
the second node did not have the link in /etc/init.d for the lsb script.

All seems to be working now.

I am confused a little about this this works though.  When I start a 
resource on one node, does it automatically run the stop of that 
resource on the other nodes?

-JPH

Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Jeff Humes wrote:
>
>> I have created a  simple heartbeat cluster:
>>
>> 2 Centos 4.5 nodes
>>
>> HB version:
>> heartbeat-pils-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
>> heartbeat-stonith-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
>> heartbeat-gui-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
>> heartbeat-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
>>
>>
>> Here is the issue I see, and I dont know what I am doing wrong.
>> I have a simple group (*"GROUP_knworks_assp"*) setup.  It is 
>> colocated and ordered.
>> the issue is that I can get the IP address to work, but the LSB init 
>> script will not work.
>>
>> I have followed the document:
>>   http://www.linux-ha.org/LSBResourceAgent
>> it meets all of the requirements and passes all the correct return 
>> codes to be LSB Compliant.
>>
>> The IP address is on node1, and the LSB script says: unmanaged and 
>> failed.
>>
>> crm_mon -1 output:
>> Resource Group: GROUP_knworks_assp
>>   knworks_assp_ip     (heartbeat::ocf:IPaddr2):       Started asknmapr01
>>   knworks_assp_initscript     (lsb:knworks_assp_init_script.sh):      
>> Started asknmapr02 (unmanaged) FAILED
>>
>> Failed actions:
>>   knworks_assp_initscript_monitor_0 (node=asknmapr02, call=77, 
>> rc=254): Error
>>   knworks_assp_initscript_stop_0 (node=asknmapr02, call=78, rc=254): 
>> Error
>>
>
> 254?  that can't be good - especially since thats supposed to be the 
> massaged rc value (the raw rc is mapped to one of the entries in the 
> UNIFORM_RET_EXECRA enum).
>
> what do the logs say?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems