[Linux-HA] STONITH smart-ups 1500I
Etienne van Tonder
evt at infoware.com.au
Tue Oct 11 04:56:00 MDT 2005
I've had a look at nut and it certainly allows for my configuration.
Before I try it won't I face the same problem with the port being locked by
stonith. Nut still has to communicate with the UPS to determine if a power
failure has occurred the same as apcupds.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Robertson" <alanr at unix.sh>
To: "General Linux-HA mailing list" <linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] STONITH smart-ups 1500I
> Etienne van Tonder wrote:
> > Ok I've looked into this a bit further.
> > apcupsd creates a lock file in /var/lock to indicate that it is using
> > device. Stonith must check to see if the device is locked.
> > Is it safe for both stonith/apcupsd to use the port at the same time?
> > If so I could tell apcupsd to create it's lock file in a different
> > to try and overcome the problem.
> No. The two uses are mutually incompatible.
> Each application is sure it owns the device :-)
> Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh>
> "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
> claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
More information about the Linux-HA