[Linux-HA] Stonith question
lmb at suse.de
Thu Mar 10 13:36:54 MST 2005
On 2005-03-10T21:19:09, hm at seneca.muc.de wrote:
> > That doesn't make sense. There can't be a communication failure between
> > them, because as you said in your original mail, the primary takes over
> > the resources just fine from the secondary, and _then_ invokes STONITH.
> It's not impossible that it was that way round.
Ah, ok. As Alan said, that's what might happen if the communication
link_s_ (it is plural, is it not?) both have taken time to come up, and
took longer to do so than the initial deadtime.
Alas, for two links or more, that's not all that likely.
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb at suse.de>
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business
More information about the Linux-HA