[Linux-HA] Cisco Switch question

[Boulytchev, Vasiliy]

Right.
	Also, our redundancy comes over BGP... I just love having my ips
from arinc, not from any isp, makes our backbones smoke :) 


Vasiliy Boulytchev
Colorado Information Technologies, Inc.
http://www.coinfotech.com

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-ha-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Alan Robertson
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 2:37 PM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Cisco Switch question


Boulytchev, Vasiliy wrote:
> Actually, this applies to switches :)  We have level 3 cisco switches 
> at the access layer.

Right.  I meant dumb switches.

> This clears up the question, if I manually write a script and clear 
> arp, we are good to go.  If you colo at an ISP where you have no 
> control of their fabric, I am sure the admin can set a low arp timeout on
those ports.


Just this week, we got a patch from Horms which corrects a previously
unnoticed non-compliance with RFCs and common practices.

It would be interesting to see if this patch cleared up your problem.

-- 
     Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh>

"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship...  Let me claim
from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4357 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha/attachments/20040611/ff55c75c/smime-0001.bin