Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:05:26 -0500 (EST)
Does it support 15 nodes with simultaneous mounts to the shared array? A
revisit of Kimberlite is definitely also on the list because I do realize
that some improvements have been put into place since the last look.
Question since we're on Kimberlite. How does MCL plan on handling the
future of Kimberlite development? How does Kimberlite development affect
the commercial product, Convolo? My only concern is that if we base a
package from an open source effort, we want to be sure that this
development continues. GFS is obviously one of Sistina's main focuses,
along with LVM, but what about MCL and Kimberlite? Just curious what the
stance is on that level.
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Tom Coughlan wrote:
> Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> > ...but Kimberlite currently has
> > limitation as far as fibre channel ...
> For the record, Kimberlite now supports Fibre Channel. See:
> Tom Coughlan
> Mission Critical Linux
> tel: 978-606-0262
this is my sig.