[Linux-ha-dev] Re: Announcing: 2.99.1 (beta! release)
ygao at novell.com
Mon Oct 6 23:30:13 MDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:30 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2008-10-06T12:32:11, Yan Gao <ygao at novell.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 17:39 +0900, renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > > Hi Xinwei,
> > >
> > > I understood it.
> > >
> > > Then I will use latest GUI next week.
> > > If there is a problem in GUI, I report it in a mailing list of Pacemaker.
> > Any comments or suggestions are welcome;-)
> I think it definetely needs to be renamed to at least "pacemaker-pygui",
> the package just being called "pygui" doesn't work.
Yes, definetely. I've renamed it to "pacemaker-pygui" when I added 1.4
revision tag. Actually I don't think "pacemaker-pygui" is ideal
Because it includes the snmp subagent and the backend of the "pygui".
Maybe "pacemaker-mgmt" or something is better?
> > It is able to work with pacemaker 0.7 and theoretically with pacemaker
> > 0.6 (I haven't tested it yet).
> > It supports Relax-NG schemas except DTD , and recognizes different
> > versions of CIB xml
> Maybe a new release would be in order then?
Yes, I do think so too. We could release it as "2.0" at an appropriate
> > There're known problems that I haven't fixed yet.
> > * Cannot add attributes or sub-objects for non-existent optional objects
> > such as "rsc_defaults " and "op_defaults"
> > * Render widgets incorrectly for attributes and elements with "anyName"
> > such as the "status"
> > * "Start/Stop/Default Run" a resource need to be reimplemented
> Will these be fixed shortly? That would sort-of be really required.
Yes, I'll fix them ASAP.
> > TODO:
> > * A simple mode for beginners or general uses
> > * Widzards for convenience of adding resources
> > * Provide detailed information: failed operations, pending operations,
> > scores of resources, crm_verify, PE graph...
> > * Shadow configuration
> I see. And, of course, calling the crm shell instead of directly
> interacting with the CIB ;-)
I think maybe we could use the same way as crm shell does to implement
them to avoid "fork"ing for times. What do you think?
> Does a roadmap exist for these features?
I hope I could fix the previous problems and work out the first two
features in two or three weeks, and I really want get the last two
features done before releasing SLES 11. Is the middle or end of November
China R&D Software Engineer
ygao at novell.com
SUSE® Linux Enterprise 10
Your Linux is ready
More information about the Linux-HA-Dev