[Linux-ha-dev] Adding "reload" to the OCF specification

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 8/15/06, Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh> wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On 6/28/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.de> wrote:
> >> On 2006-06-15T18:26:24, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Lack of disagreement implies agreement.
> >>
> >> Alan, how about we plan this as an enhancement for 2.0.7?
> >
> > Unlikely.
> > This is a significant departure from the current design and a major
> > piece of work.
> > Essentially all the same problems from the "migrate" discussion apply.
>
>
> I don't quite follow that.
>
> The assumption here is that if you enable reload, that it has no visible
> negative effect on its dependent children.
>
> So, you sneak in and do it, and nothing else is effected.
>

right - lmb helped me understand that further on in the thread.
the problem is knowing what variables cause a reload and which ones
cause a restart.
to know that we need to change the lrm