[Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Linux-ha-cvs] Linux-HA CVS: lib by gshi from
Guochun Shi
gshi at ncsa.uiuc.edu
Thu Feb 24 09:54:57 MST 2005
At 09:12 PM 2/23/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>Alan Robertson wrote:
>>Guochun Shi wrote:
>>
>>>At 03:54 PM 2/23/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>>>
>>>>linux-ha-cvs at lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>linux-ha CVS committal
>>>>>Author : gshi
>>>>>Host : Project : linux-ha
>>>>>Module : lib
>>>>>Dir : linux-ha/lib/clplumbing
>>>>>
>>>>>Modified Files:
>>>>> ipcsocket.c Log Message:
>>>>>if channel is not connected,
>>>>>a blocking send should return IPC_FAIL
>>>>>===================================================================
>>>>>RCS file: /home/cvs/linux-ha/linux-ha/lib/clplumbing/ipcsocket.c,v
>>>>>retrieving revision 1.123
>>>>>retrieving revision 1.124
>>>>>diff -u -3 -r1.123 -r1.124
>>>>>--- ipcsocket.c 11 Feb 2005 21:39:35 -0000 1.123
>>>>>+++ ipcsocket.c 23 Feb 2005 18:05:29 -0000 1.124
>>>>>@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>>>>>-/* $Id: ipcsocket.c,v 1.123 2005/02/11 21:39:35 alan Exp $ */
>>>>>+/* $Id: ipcsocket.c,v 1.124 2005/02/23 18:05:29 gshi Exp $ */
>>>>>/*
>>>>>* ipcsocket unix domain socket implementation of IPC abstraction.
>>>>>*
>>>>>@@ -767,6 +767,11 @@
>>>>> }
>>>>> while (ch->send_queue->current_qlen >= ch->send_queue->max_qlen){
>>>>>+ if (ch->ch_status != IPC_CONNECT){
>>>>>+ cl_log(LOG_ERR, "socket_send:"
>>>>>+ " message queue exceeded and IPC not connected");
>>>>>+ return IPC_FAIL;
>>>>>+ }
>>>>> cl_shortsleep();
>>>>> ch->ops->resume_io(ch);
>>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I reread this code in context... It's not as obvious as it could be... BUT, setting that aside...
>>>>
>>>>What is this "should_send_blocking" mode on the IPC channel? The whole idea of this IPC code is that it should NEVER block.
>>>>
>>>>And, there doesn't appear to be any way to set this "should_send_blocking" flag on either...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>There is no api to do that but a client can set it directly. By default IPC code is never blocked There are cases a client may want to wait until the send is done
>>
>>There is an explicit API call for that already. This is why I didn't understand this...
>
>
>Is this the call you put in to make the tests (that don't do flow control) work easily?
>
>If so, I guess I understand it now...
I am not sure which call you are talking about
-Guocun
More information about the Linux-HA-Dev
mailing list