[Linux-ha-dev] [RFC] Version numbering and roadmap

[Horms]

On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 05:28:59PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I'm not sure about the need to jump from 1.3.x to 1.99.x (is this a 
> convention?) but other than that the future version numbers seem ok to 
> me.  Even if the CRM isn't enabled by default, I think its presence 
> warrants a 2.0 tag.

I am not sure about the 1.99 but either, seems some what spurious,
but also harmless so I don't really mind if that is what Lars 
wants to do.

-- 
Horms