[Linux-ha-dev] [RFC] Version numbering and roadmap
horms at verge.net.au
Sun Sep 26 20:17:51 MDT 2004
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 05:28:59PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I'm not sure about the need to jump from 1.3.x to 1.99.x (is this a
> convention?) but other than that the future version numbers seem ok to
> me. Even if the CRM isn't enabled by default, I think its presence
> warrants a 2.0 tag.
I am not sure about the 1.99 but either, seems some what spurious,
but also harmless so I don't really mind if that is what Lars
wants to do.
More information about the Linux-HA-Dev