[Linux-ha-dev] Bug in lrmd / OCF RAs
Sun Jiang Dong
hasjd at cn.ibm.com
Mon Sep 6 10:34:49 MDT 2004
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-09-06T10:16:15,
> Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh> said:
>>>Yes, I think 99 parameters is way enough, but I thought someone might
>>>have more than 0-9 parameters... Just to be on the safe side ;-)
>>It doesn't matter. It just has to be consistent.
>>There is no limit implied by the format.
> I don't care actually. I was just trying to avoid confusion about how to
> sort arg1, arg9 vs arg10 ;-) Let's for a change agree to agree ;-)
I have used a way to sort the command line parameters in hashtable. pls
refer my former mail.
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev at lists.linux-ha.org
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
More information about the Linux-HA-Dev