[Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Linux-ha-cvs] Linux-HA CVS: linux-ha by g shi from

[Soffen, Matthew]

I'm not sure if this will work.

I'll have to test it on my Solaris box( which does have an ancient version
of perl on it).

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Marowsky-Bree [mailto:lmb at suse.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:49 AM
To: High-Availability Linux Development List
Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Linux-ha-cvs] Linux-HA CVS: linux-ha by
gshi from


On 2004-06-22T18:04:17,
   Horms <horms at verge.net.au> said:

> -			#if test "$PERL_VERSION" -lt "5.008001" 2>&1 ; then
> -			if test ${valid_ver} = "no"; then
> -				enable_swig="no"
> -			else
> -				dnl We seem to have passed all tests
> +			if perl -e "use 5.008001;" >& /dev/null; then

Any particular reason for not using $PERL here but the raw call to perl?

Otherwise it looks good, thanks for the work.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb at suse.de>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering	      \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs			      | try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ 	-- Samuel Beckett

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev at lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/