[Linux-ha-dev] Re: The issue of shutdown
alanr at unix.sh
Wed Dec 1 07:37:24 MST 2004
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-12-01T07:20:17, Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh> wrote:
>>No argument. I would just argue that the CRM's bug is more severe... The
>>other one is primarily, like you said, a safety net in case of a CRM crash
>>during shutdown or whatever...
> No argument there either, I wasn't disagreeing with this.
>>And, we need to make each resource request a process group for reasons
> OK. That's mostly LRM-internal though, right?
Completely. But, it would also solve this "getting killed prematurely"
business too... So, there's a certain symmetry in the two fixes - as both
are really needed, but not for the reasons first proposed...
Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim
from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce
More information about the Linux-HA-Dev