[Linux-ha-dev] Re: The issue of shutdown

Alan Robertson alanr at unix.sh
Wed Dec 1 07:37:24 MST 2004


Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-12-01T07:20:17, Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh> wrote:
> 
> 
>>No argument.  I would just argue that the CRM's bug is more severe... The 
>>other one is primarily, like you said, a safety net in case of a CRM crash 
>>during shutdown or whatever...
> 
> 
> No argument there either, I wasn't disagreeing with this.
> 
> 
>>And, we need to make each resource request a process group for reasons 
>>previously explained.
> 
> 
> OK. That's mostly LRM-internal though, right?

Completely.  But, it would also solve this "getting killed prematurely" 
business too...  So, there's a certain symmetry in the two fixes - as both 
are really needed, but not for the reasons first proposed...


-- 
     Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh>

"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship...  Let me claim 
from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce



More information about the Linux-HA-Dev mailing list