[Linux-ha-dev] LinuxFailSafe information

[Jerome Etienne]

On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 11:38:52AM -0500, Simon Patience wrote:
> > so they all need fsck. 
> 
> No. XFS does not need fsck. The log is re-run on mount.

ok
 
> > btw if the log is corrupted, even journaled fs still need to scan the 
> > entire fs, what you call a 'full fsck'
> 
> If the log is corrupted then you have a whole set of problems more than
> fsck! 

does this mean that most journaled fs assume that the log is never 
corrupted ? so if one sector of my log is broken, how can i fix
the corrupted fs ?


ps: this discussion may appear off topic, but to know what happen
    in case of faillure is the heart of high availability.