[ENBD] Compiling under AMD64 fails

Dr. Volker Jaenisch volker.jaenisch at inqbus.de
Wed Sep 19 17:03:09 MDT 2007


Hi Peter!

Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> Well, try 2.4.34 and tell me if it works for you. Then we can
> interpolate!
>   
Sorry for the complaining!

2.4.34pre compiles flawlessly under AMD64.

Maybe you should remove the "pre" suffix to encourage precautious people 
to use it. :-)

Thank you very much.

We will share our experiances with endb.

<OFF TOPIC>
Backgroud:
We are performing a study on cheap linux SAN structures. We will test 
most of the combinations
of DRBD, (X)NDB, iSCSI, ATAoE with Software-RAID, OCFS2, NFS and maybe 
openGFS.
The motivation for our analysis is the paper
http://www.linux-magazin.de/heft_abo/ausgaben/2006/07/block_spirale?special=Storage&category=13791
</OFF TOPIC>

NDB below Software-RAID gives very promising performance results. The 
only problem is the stability of NDB
in case of network trouble. We are optimistic that enbd is more robust 
by design.

If you like to contribute to this performance study your are welcome. We 
will publish the results of our study under the GPL.

Best Regards,

Volker




-- 
====================================================
   inqbus it-consulting      +49 ( 341 )  5643800
   Dr.  Volker Jaenisch      http://www.inqbus.de
   Herloßsohnstr.    12      0 4 1 5 5    Leipzig
   N  O  T -  F Ä L L E      +49 ( 170 )  3113748
====================================================



More information about the ENBD mailing list